The above video is entirely shot using iPhone in just one day all around the world. It was shot around 10 Countries at 15 Locations . From here we can get known to the dam-good video quality of the phone by apple. Well it was not just one person on one team to shot this but there were several crews all around the world who where enjoying this means taking shots for the above video to get delivered. All the crews were communicating with each other using Facetime on iPhone. So enjoy this video featuring the use of apple iPhone at the most. This video shows the use of apple products and advancement of technology side by side.

The below video is of behind the scenes. It contains the shots which are taken while taking actual shot for the above video ;) ;)

For me its just not a beautiful video which is just good for entertainment,,,, its much more like an inspirational video. Have a great time - enjoy :)

A high-level language is an advanced computer programming language that isn't limited by the computer, designed for a specific job, and is easier to understand. Today, there are dozens of high-level languages; some examples include BASIC, C, FORTAN, Java, C++ and Pascal. These are independent of the internal machine code of any particular computer.

High-level languages are used to solve problems and are often described as problem-oriented languages; a low-level language is the opposite of a High Level Language. It is one which exposes a significant amount of the computer's inner workings; for instance, in C Language, one deals with the concept of memory and pointers, whereas in Haskell Language, there is no concept of storing data. This aspect of CeeLanguage is low-level. The lowest-level language is MachineCode, which hides no details of the machine; not even the bit patterns used to form instructions are abstracted.

Low-level languages have the advantage that the programmer is able to tune the code to be smaller or more efficient, and that more system-dependent features are sometimes available. They have the disadvantage that they are often (usually?) harder to program in.

In computing, a low-level programming language is designed for a particular computer and reflects its internal Machine Code; low-level languages are therefore often described as machine-oriented languages. They cannot easily be converted to run on a computer with a different central processing unit, and they are relatively difficult to learn because a detailed knowledge of the internal workings of the computer is required. Since they must be translated into machine code by an assembler program, low-level languages are also called Assembly Languages.

A mnemonic-based low-level language replaces binary machine-code instructions, which are very hard to remember, write down, or correct, with short codes (mnemonics) chosen to remind the programmer of the instructions they represent. For example, the binary-code instruction that means ‘store the contents of the accumulator’ may be represented with the mnemonic STA (STore to Acummulator).

In contrast, high-level languages are designed to solve particular problems and are therefore described as problem-oriented languages: for example, BASIC was designed to be easily learnt by first-time programmers; COBOL is used to write programs solving business problems; and FORTRAN is used for programs solving scientific and mathematical problems

A High Level Programming Language is a Programming Language that supports system development at a high Level Of Abstraction, thereby freeing the developer from keeping in his head lots of details that are irrelevant to the problem at hand.

Starting a development effort at a high level of abstraction often leads to shorter development time since it retains opportunities to specialize the design, e.g. to adapt it to unforeseen insights into the Application Domain or to incorporate changing requirements. It is usually harder to generalize a specific design than to specialize or extend the design, since unanticipated generalization may force the re-examination of many existing relations between the constituents of the system to identify hard-coded design decisions that may have been invalidated. However see Premature Generalization.

Starting a development effort at a low level of abstraction often leads to Premature Optimization. Also see Top Down Programming and Bottom Up Programming. Working at a high level of abstraction does not necessarily preclude runtime efficiency of the implementation. Many modern languages (e.g. C Plus Plus, Common Lisp, Ada Language) aim to provide access to low level elements of the implementation while retaining means to develop at a high level of abstraction. Most language implementations allow to drop out to a different language to implement specific parts of a system at a lower level of abstraction.

The term "High Level Language" was originally used to distinguish things like Fortran Language from things like assembly language. Therefore, originally "high level language" very much included Fortran, Basic, COBOL, PL/I, and a little later, C.

Observing that such languages are not very high level compared with e.g. Prolog, YACC, Lex, ML, Haskell, etc, some people started calling the older high level languages "low level languages", or qualifying them as "higher level languages", etc. This is is often erroneously thought to be revisionism but is the very basis of much of Computer Science, and such terminology while not universally accepted among all programmers, is at least understood by those with a broad understanding of the relevant foundations of the topic at hand.

A more diplomatic approach to the topic, while sacrificing accuracy to appeal to the less-disciplined mind, would be to simply call more sophisticated languages "very high level languages", if a distinction is needed, rather than trying to snidely imply (or state outright) that there's no difference between assembler and Fortran, Basic, COBOL, PL/I, C etc.

No one who has done extensive programming in assembler would ever make the mistake of calling such things "low level languages"; there is a very sharp and painful difference.

A programming language is an artificial language designed to communicate instructions to a machine, particularly a computer. Programming languages can be used to create programs that control the behavior of a machine and/or to express algorithms.

The earliest programming languages preceded the invention of the computer, and were used to direct the behavior of machines such as Jacquard looms and player pianos. Thousands of different programming languages have been created, mainly in the computer field, and still many are being created every year. Many programming languages require computation to be specified in an imperative form (i.e., as a sequence of operations to perform), while other languages utilize other forms of program specification such as the declarative form (i.e., the desired result is specified, not how to achieve it).

The description of a programming language is usually split into the two components of syntax (form) and semantics (meaning). Some languages are defined by a specification document (for example, the C programming language is specified by an ISO Standard), while other languages (such as Perl) have a dominant implementation that is treated as a reference.

An assembly language is a low-level programming language for a computer, or other programmable device, in which there is a very strong (generally one-to-one) correspondence between the language and the architecture's machine code instructions. Each assembly language is specific to a particular computer architecture, in contrast to most high-level programming languages, which are generally portable across multiple architectures, but require interpreting or compiling.

Assembly language is converted into executable machine code by a utility program referred to as an assembler; the conversion process is referred to as assembly, or assembling the code.

Assembly language uses a mnemonic to represent each low-level machine operation or opcode. Some opcodes require one or more operands as part of the instruction, and most assemblers can take labels and symbols as operands to represent addresses and constants, instead of hard coding them into the program. Macro assemblers include a macro-instruction facility so that assembly language text can be pre-assigned to a name, and that name can be used to insert the text into other code. Many assemblers offer additional mechanisms to facilitate program development, to control the assembly process, and to aid debugging.

Machine language, also known as machine code, is a computer language that is directly understandable by a computer's CPU (central processing unit), and it is the language into which all programs must be converted before they can be run. Each CPU type has its own machine language, although they are basically fairly similar.

After the source code for a program has been written by one or more humans in a programming language (e.g., C or C++), it is compiled (i.e., converted) into machine code by a specialized program called a compiler, or by an assembler in the case of assembly language. This machine code is then stored as an executable file (i.e., a ready-to-run program) and can be executed (i.e., run) by the operating system any time it is instructed to do so by another program or by a user.

Machine code is extremely difficult for humans to read because it consists merely of patterns of bits (i.e., zeros and ones). Thus, programmers who want to work at the machine code level instead usually use assembly language, which is a human-readable notation for the machine language in which the instructions represented by patterns of zeros and ones are replaced with alphanumeric symbols (called mnemonics) in order to make it easier to remember and work with them (including reducing the chances of making errors). In contrast to high-level languages (e.g., C, C++, Java, Perl and Python), there is a nearly one to one correspondence between a simple assembly language and its corresponding machine language.

Programs for the first electronic computers were written directly in machine code. However, the development of assembly language from the 1950s led to a large increase in programmer productivity. Initially, programs written in assembly language programs were hand-translated into machine code, but this tedious task was later eliminated by the development of assemblers to automate the translations.